Legal advice

[b_9904]

ey, do i have to pay or anything? coz i dont have much money.

anyway, i need help about our marriage laws and annulment laws... can you guys send me a copy of the law-all of it-if you have any in your computer file or can you direct me to any reference or source i can read or a web page or site i can visit.

Thank you in advance and God bless you all.

[KuyaDanny]

The major document, I believe is the Family Code of the Philippines.

There are other laws and requirements. This website is quite informative:

Philippine Laws & Legal Requirements on Marriage (http://www.weddingsatwork.com/culture/philaws.htm).

[b_9904]

Originally posted by KuyaDanny
The major document, I believe is the Family Code of the Philippines.

There are other laws and requirements. This website is quite informative:

Philippine Laws & Legal Requirements on Marriage (http://www.weddingsatwork.com/culture/philaws.htm).

ey, thank you kuya danny.

btw, here's the deal kaya im asking for help.

there is a girl who wants to marry me for a day and have an anulmeny the day after the marriage and is willing to pay me for it.

i'm trying to make a contract protecting me from the laws, the congugal property and everything.

thats why i was asking for a source.

ey, do you think it is legal? or will i end up married forever to the girl-pikot style ba.

[saywhat]

What?! Now if that ain't weird....

[Diego22]

b_9904 dude, according to our civil code marriage can be annuled by

1. physchological incapacity,
2. homosexuality
3. under age
4. drug addiction

and other requisites that requires evidence based pleadings. now with regard to your planned "contract" to protect you from further obligations a day after your so called marriage, i have to be frank that no Philippine laws can accomodate your request on grounds that "marriage" is a "special contract" entered by two persons of good faith to cohabit and this contract ceases to exist only by death or the above stated factors to be determined by the proper courts

but if you are referring to "Pre-nuptial" agreement then we are looking on a long term basis here and not a pre-meditated act to be consumated not long than 24 hours.

in short kung gusto nyong gawin yan wag naman one day lang gawin nyo naman mga at least one to six months.

[KuyaDanny]

I would first like to know what this woman is trying to accomplish by being married to you for one day only.

[eponine0907]

Originally posted by b_9904

btw, here's the deal kaya im asking for help.

there is a girl who wants to marry me for a day and have an anulmeny the day after the marriage and is willing to pay me for it.

i'm trying to make a contract protecting me from the laws, the congugal property and everything.

thats why i was asking for a source.

ey, do you think it is legal? or will i end up married forever to the girl-pikot style ba.

hi.

there are some things that are bugging me about your questions.

1) why would the girl want to marry you today and have the marriage annulled tomorrow? i mean, meron bang pressure on her side to get married? kung yan ang case, then there's undue influence on her part, walang valid consent, therefore walang valid marriage.

2) does it have something to do with properties? it's true na pag kinasal ang dalawang tao they will enter into what is known as a conjugal partnership -- whatever they bring into the marriage, plus what they gain during the marriage belongs to them equally, kahit na mas malaki ang kinikita ng isa. if you guys don't want this to happen, enter into a pre-nuptial agreement, para klaro ang lahat ng property arrangements nyo.

3) for the court to grant an annulment or declare the nullity of a marriage, there must be convincing proof of psychological incapacity, or any of the other grounds mentioned in articles 35-38 of the Family Code. for example, kung walang consent nung girl yung marriage nyo, that can be a ground for nullity of marriage. pero ang pinakaginagamit na ground is psychological incapacity, and that's quite difficult to prove. maraming requirements before any of the parties can be proven to be psychologically incapable of fulfilling marital duties.

4) as much as possible, the State is duty bound to protect marriages and families. kaya nga mas mahirap i-annul ang contract of marriage, kasi nga it is "a special contract of permanent union...whose nature, consequences and incidents are governed by law and not subject to stipulation."

hope i was of help.



:blossom:

[sedfrey]

hi eponine!!

nice to see you again. i'm drowning in civpro!!!! tax!!!! election!!!!!!!!!! good luck sa finals mo!

[PUGSLEY]

Originally posted by b_9904
ey, do i have to pay or anything? coz i dont have much money.

anyway, i need help about our marriage laws and annulment laws... can you guys send me a copy of the law-all of it-if you have any in your computer file or can you direct me to any reference or source i can read or a web page or site i can visit.

Thank you in advance and God bless you all.

Aside from the law previously mentioned by other PExers , theres a thread I started a few months back.

It includes cases on annulment , legal separation and other jurisprudence on family
relations.

http://www.pinoyexchange.com/forums/showthread.php3?s=&threadid=47112&pagenumber=1

[clone19]

what about me? IM BISEXUAL, but i plan to get married. i will tell her of course, so does that mean "the homosexuality issue" is already VOID?

[PUGSLEY]

Originally posted by clone19
what about me? IM BISEXUAL, but i plan to get married. i will tell her of course, so does that mean "the homosexuality issue" is already VOID?

Please find time to read Article 35 to 47 and 55 to 57 of the Family Code

[PUGSLEY]

Chapter 3. Void and Voidable Marriages

Art. 35. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning:
(1) Those contracted by any party below eighteen years of age even with the consent of parents or guardians;
(2) Those solemnized by any person not legally authorized to perform marriages unless such marriages were contracted with either or both parties believing in good faith that the solemnizing officer had the legal authority to do so;

(3) Those solemnized without license, except those covered the preceding Chapter;

(4) Those bigamous or polygamous marriages not failing under Article 41;

(5) Those contracted through mistake of one contracting party as to the identity of the other; and

(6) Those subsequent marriages that are void under Article 53.

Art. 36. A marriage contracted by any party who, at the time of the celebration, was psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations of marriage, shall likewise be void even if such incapacity becomes manifest only after its solemnization. (As amended by Executive Order 227)
Art. 37. Marriages between the following are incestuous and void from the beginning, whether relationship between the parties be legitimate or illegitimate:

(1) Between ascendants and descendants of any degree; and
(2) Between brothers and sisters, whether of the full or half blood. (81a)

Art. 38. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning for reasons of public policy:
(1) Between collateral blood relatives whether legitimate or illegitimate, up to the fourth civil degree;
(2) Between step-parents and step-children;

(3) Between parents-in-law and children-in-law;

(4) Between the adopting parent and the adopted child;

(5) Between the surviving spouse of the adopting parent and the adopted child;

(6) Between the surviving spouse of the adopted child and the adopter;

(7) Between an adopted child and a legitimate child of the adopter;

(8) Between adopted children of the same adopter; and

(9) Between parties where one, with the intention to marry the other, killed that other person's spouse, or his or her own spouse. (82)

Art. 39. The action or defense for the declaration of absolute nullity of a marriage shall not prescribe. (As amended by Executive Order 227 and Republic Act No. 8533; The phrase "However, in case of marriage celebrated before the effectivity of this Code and falling under Article 36, such action or defense shall prescribe in ten years after this Code shall taken effect" has been deleted by Republic Act No. 8533 [Approved February 23, 1998]).
Art. 40. The absolute nullity of a previous marriage may be invoked for purposes of remarriage on the basis solely of a final judgment declaring such previous marriage void. (n)

Art. 41. A marriage contracted by any person during subsistence of a previous marriage shall be null and void, unless before the celebration of the subsequent marriage, the prior spouse had been absent for four consecutive years and the spouse present has a well-founded belief that the absent spouse was already dead. In case of disappearance where there is danger of death under the circumstances set forth in the provisions of Article 391 of the Civil Code, an absence of only two years shall be sufficient.

For the purpose of contracting the subsequent marriage under the preceding paragraph the spouse present must institute a summary proceeding as provided in this Code for the declaration of presumptive death of the absentee, without prejudice to the effect of reappearance of the absent spouse. (83a)

Art. 42. The subsequent marriage referred to in the preceding Article shall be automatically terminated by the recording of the affidavit of reappearance of the absent spouse, unless there is a judgment annulling the previous marriage or declaring it void ab initio.

A sworn statement of the fact and circumstances of reappearance shall be recorded in the civil registry of the residence of the parties to the subsequent marriage at the instance of any interested person, with due notice to the spouses of the subsequent marriage and without prejudice to the fact of reappearance being judicially determined in case such fact is disputed. (n)

Art. 43. The termination of the subsequent marriage referred to in the preceding Article shall produce the following effects:

(1) The children of the subsequent marriage conceived prior to its termination shall be considered legitimate;
(2) The absolute community of property or the conjugal partnership, as the case may be, shall be dissolved and liquidated, but if either spouse contracted said marriage in bad faith, his or her share of the net profits of the community property or conjugal partnership property shall be forfeited in favor of the common children or, if there are none, the children of the guilty spouse by a previous marriage or in default of children, the innocent spouse;

(3) Donations by reason of marriage shall remain valid, except that if the donee contracted the marriage in bad faith, such donations made to said donee are revoked by operation of law;

(4) The innocent spouse may revoke the designation of the other spouse who acted in bad faith as beneficiary in any insurance policy, even if such designation be stipulated as irrevocable; and

(5) The spouse who contracted the subsequent marriage in bad faith shall be disqualified to inherit from the innocent spouse by testate and intestate succession. (n)

Art. 44. If both spouses of the subsequent marriage acted in bad faith, said marriage shall be void ab initio and all donations by reason of marriage and testamentary dispositions made by one in favor of the other are revoked by operation of law. (n)
Art. 45. A marriage may be annulled for any of the following causes, existing at the time of the marriage:

(1) That the party in whose behalf it is sought to have the marriage annulled was eighteen years of age or over but below twenty-one, and the marriage was solemnized without the consent of the parents, guardian or person having substitute parental authority over the party, in that order, unless after attaining the age of twenty-one, such party freely cohabited with the other and both lived together as husband and wife;
(2) That either party was of unsound mind, unless such party after coming to reason, freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife;

(3) That the consent of either party was obtained by fraud, unless such party afterwards, with full knowledge of the facts constituting the fraud, freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife;

(4) That the consent of either party was obtained by force, intimidation or undue influence, unless the same having disappeared or ceased, such party thereafter freely cohabited with the other as husband and wife;

(5) That either party was physically incapable of consummating the marriage with the other, and such incapacity continues and appears to be incurable; or

(6) That either party was afflicted with a sexually-transmissible disease found to be serious and appears to be incurable. (85a)

Art. 46. Any of the following circumstances shall constitute fraud referred to in Number 3 of the preceding Article:
(1) Non-disclosure of a previous conviction by final judgment of the other party of a crime involving moral turpitude;
(2) Concealment by the wife of the fact that at the time of the marriage, she was pregnant by a man other than her husband;

(3) Concealment of sexually transmissible disease, regardless of its nature, existing at the time of the marriage; or

(4) Concealment of drug addiction, habitual alcoholism or homosexuality or lesbianism existing at the time of the marriage.

No other misrepresentation or deceit as to character, health, rank, fortune or chastity shall constitute such fraud as will give grounds for action for the annulment of marriage. (86a)

Art. 47. The action for annulment of marriage must be filed by the following persons and within the periods indicated herein:

(1) For causes mentioned in number 1 of Article 45 by the party whose parent or guardian did not give his or her consent, within five years after attaining the age of twenty-one, or by the parent or guardian or person having legal charge of the minor, at any time before such party has reached the age of twenty-one;
(2) For causes mentioned in number 2 of Article 45, by the same spouse, who had no knowledge of the other's insanity; or by any relative or guardian or person having legal charge of the insane, at any time before the death of either party, or by the insane spouse during a lucid interval or after regaining sanity;

(3) For causes mentioned in number 3 of Article 45, by the injured party, within five years after the discovery of the fraud;

(4) For causes mentioned in number 4 of Article 45, by the injured party, within five years from the time the force, intimidation or undue influence disappeared or ceased;

(5) For causes mentioned in number 5 and 6 of Article 45, by the injured party, within five years after the marriage. (87a)



TITLE II

LEGAL SEPARATION

Art. 55. A petition for legal separation may be filed on any of the following grounds:
(1) Repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the petitioner;
(2) Physical violence or moral pressure to compel the petitioner to change religious or political affiliation;

(3) Attempt of respondent to corrupt or induce the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the petitioner, to engage in prostitution, or connivance in such corruption or inducement;

(4) Final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment of more than six years, even if pardoned;

(5) Drug addiction or habitual alcoholism of the respondent;

(6) Lesbianism or homosexuality of the respondent;

(7) Contracting by the respondent of a subsequent bigamous marriage, whether in the Philippines or abroad;

(8) Sexual infidelity or perversion;

(9) Attempt by the respondent against the life of the petitioner; or

(10) Abandonment of petitioner by respondent without justifiable cause for more than one year.

For purposes of this Article, the term "child" shall include a child by nature or by adoption. (9a)
Art. 56. The petition for legal separation shall be denied on any of the following grounds:

(1) Where the aggrieved party has condoned the offense or act complained of;
(2) Where the aggrieved party has consented to the commission of the offense or act complained of;

(3) Where there is connivance between the parties in the commission of the offense or act constituting the ground for legal separation;

(4) Where both parties have given ground for legal separation;

(5) Where there is collusion between the parties to obtain decree of legal separation; or

(6) Where the action is barred by prescription. (100a)

Art. 57. An action for legal separation shall be filed within five years from the time of the occurrence of the cause. (102)

[pinaysrdbest]

Originally posted by b_9904


ey, thank you kuya danny.

btw, here's the deal kaya im asking for help.

there is a girl who wants to marry me for a day and have an anulmeny the day after the marriage and is willing to pay me for it.

i'm trying to make a contract protecting me from the laws, the congugal property and everything.

thats why i was asking for a source.

ey, do you think it is legal? or will i end up married forever to the girl-pikot style ba.




Seems it's something like THE PRICE IS RIGHT and you are considering her proposal, ey!

As far as I know, you'll be marked as married and even if annulled, you will only be called single by virtue of law.

[eponine0907]

Originally posted by sedfrey
hi eponine!!

nice to see you again. i'm drowning in civpro!!!! tax!!!! election!!!!!!!!!! good luck sa finals mo!

hey sedfrey!

how were your final exams? sa kin...disastrous. grabe. i'm just hoping that they will allow me to graduate. bar review's starting next week.:crazy:




:blossom:

[eponine0907]

Originally posted by clone19
what about me? IM BISEXUAL, but i plan to get married. i will tell her of course, so does that mean "the homosexuality issue" is already VOID?

if you tell your future bride BEFORE you get married, and she accepts it, then there's no problem. but if you don't tell her, and she finds out about it when you're married na, then she can either accept you, or she can file for annulment on the ground of fraud.




:blossom:

[b_9904]

peeps ty sa reply ha!

[b_9904]

Originally posted by KuyaDanny
I would first like to know what this woman is trying to accomplish by being married to you for one day only.

actually her only reason is just for the sake of it eh.

kuya,

after the marriage kung hindi kami nagsama after 6 mos to 1 yr pwede nang anull yun diba.

[b_9904]

Originally posted by pinaysrdbest





Seems it's something like THE PRICE IS RIGHT and you are considering her proposal, ey!

As far as I know, you'll be marked as married and even if annulled, you will only be called single by virtue of law.

yah, the price is right kinda thing.

pero mascurious ako i try kasi it has never been done before and i want to try it kung pwede.

pero other than that i dont plan to be married to her for long and risk my properties and everything pero kung hindi pwede then i wont risk it.

pero prenuptials protect me from that.

it's fine by me to be called single by virtue of law... im not that religiuos namn eh.

btw, sept 8 na nakaplan kasal namin. i'm still having doubts though.

[b_9904]

hi.

there are some things that are bugging me about your questions.

1) why would the girl want to marry you today and have the marriage annulled tomorrow? i mean, meron bang pressure on her side to get married? kung yan ang case, then there's undue influence on her part, walang valid consent, therefore walang valid marriage.--->no, she just feels like getting married for a day... may pera naman siya eh to do it. pero im protecting myself from an unwanted lifetime marriage lang kasi baka di na ako makalusot after wards. there is no pressure.

2) does it have something to do with properties? it's true na pag kinasal ang dalawang tao they will enter into what is known as a conjugal partnership -- whatever they bring into the marriage, plus what they gain during the marriage belongs to them equally, kahit na mas malaki ang kinikita ng isa. if you guys don't want this to happen, enter into a pre-nuptial agreement, para klaro ang lahat ng property arrangements nyo.--->no, not about properties, parehas kaming negosyante(21yrs old sya 21yrs old ako) pero masmalaki lang ang kita ko. ganun na nga lang pre-nuptial agreement na nga lang siguro ako. pre-nuptial diba pag-hiwalay namin walang mawawala sa kahit kanino kung nakapangalan sa kanya?

3) for the court to grant an annulment or declare the nullity of a marriage, there must be convincing proof of psychological incapacity, or any of the other grounds mentioned in articles 35-38 of the Family Code. for example, kung walang consent nung girl yung marriage nyo, that can be a ground for nullity of marriage. pero ang pinakaginagamit na ground is psychological incapacity, and that's quite difficult to prove. maraming requirements before any of the parties can be proven to be psychologically incapable of fulfilling marital duties.--->well... medyo mahirap ata yan... i got a question pwede maanul kung after sometime na hindi kayo nagsama, irregardless kung may anak o wala, ground for annulment na yun right? lets say mga six mos to one year. one more thing... a marraige out of mere whim ba ground for invalid or annulment?

4) as much as possible, the State is duty bound to protect marriages and families. kaya nga mas mahirap i-annul ang contract of marriage, kasi nga it is "a special contract of permanent union...whose nature, consequences and incidents are governed by law and not subject to stipulation."--->ok, now i will know my problem. talagang different from divorce nga ano.

hope i was of help. --->ty very much you helped a lot

[green grin]

this much i've gathered from your posts:

1) you opened this thread for free legal advice because you mentioned that you did not "have much money".

2) a girl wants to marry you and annul the marriage the next day, and she's willing to pay you for it because she has the money.

3) you want your "assets" to be protected by a prenuptial agreement, otherwise you won't risk entering this sham marriage.

4) you are both businesspeople but you earn more money than her.

5) the girl just feels like getting married and you just want to "try" it but not stay in the marriage for long.

look, pal, get your story straight. better yet, get your head straight.

tatagalogin ko na lang: ayusin mo kwento mo. hindi biro itong pinaplano mo. hindi kayo pwedeng magpakasal kasi trip niyo lang at pagkatapos eh maghihiwalayan kayo. kung pera ang pinupoblema mo, dapat malaman mo na may gastos ang pagpapakasal at may gastos din ang paghihiwalay.

at eto pa ang isipin mo: hindi porket nagsampa ng annulment sa korte ay pagbibigyan ng husgado. pwedeng ma-deny yung petisyon mo o kaya ay tumagal ang pag-lilitis. kung ma-deny ang petisyon mo ay hindi ka na pwedeng mag-asawa sa iba.

kung nabuntisan mo lang ang babae at ayaw mong pakasalan, huwag mo nang ituloy. pero kung ituloy mo pa rin ang kasal, panindigan mo.

[b_9904]

Originally posted by green grin
this much i've gathered from your posts:

1) you opened this thread for free legal advice because you mentioned that you did not "have much money".

2) a girl wants to marry you and annul the marriage the next day, and she's willing to pay you for it because she has the money.

3) you want your "assets" to be protected by a prenuptial agreement, otherwise you won't risk entering this sham marriage.

4) you are both businesspeople but you earn more money than her.

5) the girl just feels like getting married and you just want to "try" it but not stay in the marriage for long.

look, pal, get your story straight. better yet, get your head straight.

tatagalogin ko na lang: ayusin mo kwento mo. hindi biro itong pinaplano mo. hindi kayo pwedeng magpakasal kasi trip niyo lang at pagkatapos eh maghihiwalayan kayo. kung pera ang pinupoblema mo, dapat malaman mo na may gastos ang pagpapakasal at may gastos din ang paghihiwalay.

at eto pa ang isipin mo: hindi porket nagsampa ng annulment sa korte ay pagbibigyan ng husgado. pwedeng ma-deny yung petisyon mo o kaya ay tumagal ang pag-lilitis. kung ma-deny ang petisyon mo ay hindi ka na pwedeng mag-asawa sa iba.

kung nabuntisan mo lang ang babae at ayaw mong pakasalan, huwag mo nang ituloy. pero kung ituloy mo pa rin ang kasal, panindigan mo.

sagot ng girl yung kasal at annulment and everything hangang sa reception i'm just gana sit back...

kaya nga i'm asking info about the whole deal dahil i know medyo delikado.... actually yung tungkol sa pera... ayoko lang gumastos at ayoko mawalan ng properties kaya nung malaman ko about the pre-nuptial thing kaya safe na properties me right... now i wanna know kung may way out... based sa mga nagadvice sakin meron kaso... katulad ng sabi mo complicado at mahirap masabi kung pwede nga maanul yung marriage.

sorry kung medyo naguluhan ka sa story... pero ty sa advice. tama ang pagkakaintindi mo ng story yan nga ang mga detalye.

[eponine0907]

b_9904:

tama ang advice ni atty. green grin. pag-isipan mo munang mabuti ang lahat ng gagawin nyo. ang kasalan ay hindi parang naghiraman kayo ng cellphone para sa isang araw, tapos bukas solian na.

i forgot to say one thing. kahit ba kinasal kayo peron hindi kayo nagsama for 6 months, o kaya 1 year, hindi ground for annulment yon. ground for legal separation lang yon, ibig sabihin, pag legally separated kayo hindi rin kayo pwedeng magpakasal sa iba. maraming kuskos-balungos ang pagpapakasal at pagfa-file ng annulment, not to mention yung property relations nyo. take it from me -- muntik na akong makasal last year, pero buti na lang at hindi na natuloy. kung natuloy kami malamang pinagsisisihan ko ngayon yun.




:blossom:

[b_9904]

Originally posted by eponine0907
b_9904:

tama ang advice ni atty. green grin. pag-isipan mo munang mabuti ang lahat ng gagawin nyo. ang kasalan ay hindi parang naghiraman kayo ng cellphone para sa isang araw, tapos bukas solian na.

i forgot to say one thing. kahit ba kinasal kayo peron hindi kayo nagsama for 6 months, o kaya 1 year, hindi ground for annulment yon. ground for legal separation lang yon, ibig sabihin, pag legally separated kayo hindi rin kayo pwedeng magpakasal sa iba. maraming kuskos-balungos ang pagpapakasal at pagfa-file ng annulment, not to mention yung property relations nyo. take it from me -- muntik na akong makasal last year, pero buti na lang at hindi na natuloy. kung natuloy kami malamang pinagsisisihan ko ngayon yun.




:blossom:

ty, kaya nga i opned this thread dahil hindi rin ako comfortable at baka nga hindi ma-anul dead na tayo dyan diba.

man... it is really complicated. bakit hindi nalang nila payagan na mag-ka-devorce dito sa PHIL. anyway, thats none of my business.

[nailbiter]

hello. sorry to intrude but am terribly intrigued. tama po ba ang pagkakaintindi ko -- this girl is planning to "get married" for the sake of the *wedding*? she wants to become a bride for a day? tipong ganon? that's kind of what i picked up by your mention of having a reception, even, despite your supposed arrangement...

[eponine0907]

Originally posted by b_9904


ty, kaya nga i opned this thread dahil hindi rin ako comfortable at baka nga hindi ma-anul dead na tayo dyan diba.

man... it is really complicated. bakit hindi nalang nila payagan na mag-ka-devorce dito sa PHIL. anyway, thats none of my business.

whether it's divorce, annulment or legal separation, dissolving a marriage is never an easy thing to do. the best thing to do is not to rush things and get married for the sake of getting married. if you feel you don't want to, or are not prepared to face married life, then don't get married.





:blossom:

[b_9904]

nailbiter: CORECT NA CORECT KA DYAN

Eponine: ty for the advice! i'll keep that in mind atleast i am now informed about the topic and i am now having doubts about the whole thing. i'll back out eventually but i need a way to tell the girl about it.. gently. brutally frank kasi ako in person e

[nailbiter]

Originally posted by b_9904
nailbiter: CORECT NA CORECT KA DYAN


WOW! :nuts:

now this got me even more curious, pumapayag kaya ang church na mag-officiate ng wedding or to have a ceremony kung walang balak mag-asawa yung magpapakasal?

[b_9904]

Originally posted by nailbiter


WOW! :nuts:

now this got me even more curious, pumapayag kaya ang church na mag-officiate ng wedding or to have a ceremony kung walang balak mag-asawa yung magpapakasal?
ofcourse not! kaya nga we plan to make look like REAL pero... i am gana back out nalang baka hindi pa kami ma-anull and i really hate to have my options closed "BURNED BRIGES" as we use to say.

[eponine0907]

Originally posted by b_9904
nailbiter: CORECT NA CORECT KA DYAN

Eponine: ty for the advice! i'll keep that in mind atleast i am now informed about the topic and i am now having doubts about the whole thing. i'll back out eventually but i need a way to tell the girl about it.. gently. brutally frank kasi ako in person e

you're welcome. and good luck.

better be honest than to be sorry.



:blossom: